I have not posted much recently, but there has been quite a bit going on behind the scenes in the last couple of weeks. A couple of months ago my parents contacted their state representatives (Since they are Wisconsin state residents) asking them to look into the legal status of the RN licensure of Direct Entry students in Wisconsin without holding a "diploma of graduation" as is required by the Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act 441.04. They did make inquiries of the Wisconsin Department of Regulation & Licensing (DRL) on our behalf, but unfortunately did not act as advocates for us as we had hoped.
In any event our letters, and the letter from my parent's state representatives, did cause the DRL to investigate Marquette's Direct Entry program and their procedures for licensing these students without graduation dates. Debra Kraft (Interim General Counsel for the DRL) responded to my parents' State Representatives with this letter dated August 2, 2007. The letter contains several serious factual errors, and was cc'd to a wide range of individuals: including the Chair of the Wisconsin Board of Nursing, the Wisconsin Attorney General's Office, lawyers at Marquette and Lawyers at the DRL among others.
I want to make sure that the individuals who have received this letter from Ms. Kraft become aware of the falsehoods and misrepresentations in the letter before the next Wisconsin Board of Nursing meeting which will be held on August 30, so I mailed out this letter this morning:
__________________________________________________
August 18, 2007
Debra J. Kraft
Interim General Counsel
Wisconsin Department of Regulation & Licensing
P.O. Box 8935
Madison, WI 53708-8935
RE: RN LICENSURE OF MARQUETTE DIRECT ENTRY NURSING STUDENTS
Dear Ms. Kraft:
I would like to correct some misinformation that was contained in your August 2nd letter to Senator Mark Miller and Representative Joseph Parisi regarding the licensure of Marquette University’s Direct Entry nursing students. (Enclosed)
First, there is a serious problem with the 1999 letter from Wayne Austin to Madeline Wake that you discussed and attached with your letter. The version of the letter from Mr. Austin to Ms. Wake that you attached, the version provided by the Department of Regulation & Licensing (DRL), is not the same letter that was actually sent to Ms. Wake. Marquette University has produced a different letter of the same date in which Mr. Austin comes to the exact opposite conclusion about Marquette’s Direct Entry students’ eligibility for RN licensure in the State of Wisconsin. Please notice that the version of the letter produced by the DRL, the version that you are basing your stance on, does not contain Mr. Austin’s signature. The version of the letter produced by Marquette University, which does not advocate for the RN licensure of Direct Entry students in Wisconsin at the completion of the pre-MSN portion of the Direct Entry program without graduating, does contain Mr. Austin’s signature. I have enclosed both versions of this 1999 letter from Mr. Austin to Ms. Wake.
At the bottom of the second page of the real version of the 1999 letter from Wayne Austin to Madeline Wake, Mr. Austin states (emphasis mine):
If graduates of the new program will also have completed education and training which conform with the curriculum standards cited above, it is our opinion that graduates of the program would qualify both to sit for NCLEX and for licensure to practice professional nursing.
Nowhere in the letter does Mr. Austin state that "completion of the pre-MSN portion of the Direct Entry program" is to be considered a "diploma of graduation" under the Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act 441.04. Nor does the letter indicate that completion of the pre-MSN portion of the program is sufficient for RN licensure in the State of Wisconsin. The letter clearly states that only graduates of the Direct Entry MSN program are eligible for RN licensure in Wisconsin. Marquette University is quite adamant that Direct Entry students do not graduate until they have earned an MSN degree. Mr. Austin’s letter simply confirms that they would be eligible for RN licensure in Wisconsin at the time that they have graduated with an MSN degree, not at the completion of the pre-MSN phase of the program.
You state in your August 2nd letter that "the Department [of Regulation & Licensing] has again concluded that it will continue to recognize the conclusions reached by Mr. Austin in his 1999 letter." If this is the case, then the DRL has already concluded that Marquette Direct Entry students are legally eligible for RN licensure in Wisconsin not at the completion of the pre-MSN phase of the program, but only upon graduation from the MSN program. This is the conclusion that was reached by Wayne Austin in the letter that was actually sent to Madeline Wake back in 1999.
Second, your letter states that in my July 26th presentation before the Wisconsin Board of Nursing that I asked the Board to "dissolve the Marquette Direct Entry MSN Program." This is not true. I asked the Board to dissolve the "Special Agreement" with Marquette’s Direct Entry MSN program under which students are being granted Wisconsin nursing licenses without holding a "diploma of graduation" as is required by the Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act 441.04. I have no desire for the program to end: I ask only that the program be held to the same standards and legal procedures as every other school of nursing in the State of Wisconsin. A complete transcript of my presentation is available on my website: http://lydiaslicense.blogspot.com/2007/07/success-at-board-of-nursing-meeting.html
Third, the second footnote on the bottom of page two of your letter says: "The document used to verify completion of the pre-MSN phase is DRL form #259, a standard internal administrative form used to process all nursing student applications." It was not mentioned in your letter that the #259 form is also called the "Statement of Graduation" form. Marquette University lied on the #259 "Statement of Graduation" portion of my licensure application by falsely indicating that I had actually been awarded a BSN degree from their institution - and the DRL knowingly accepted this fraudulent document. (Enclosed)
In conclusion, it is vital for the Wisconsin Department of Regulation & Licensing to again re-examine the original conclusions that were drawn by Wayne Austin in 1999. I do not know why there are two conflicting versions of the letter in circulation, but the version of the letter that was signed by Mr. Austin and was actually sent to Marquette University does not in any way indicate that Marquette’s Direct Entry students are eligible for RN licensure in Wisconsin at the completion of the pre-MSN portion of the program.
Sincerely,
Lydia Bertrand
cc: Senator Mark Miller, 16th Senate District
Representative Joseph Parisi, 48th Assembly District
Celia Jackson, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Regulation & Licensing
Larry Martin, Executive Assistant, Wisconsin Department of Regulation & Licensing
Kimberly Nania, Division Administrator, Wisconsin Department of Regulation & Licensing
Marilyn Kaufmann, Chair, Wisconsin Board of Nursing
Colleen Baird, Legal Counsel, Wisconsin Board of Nursing
Thomas J. Balistreri, Assistant Attorney General, Wisconsin Department of Justice
Jeffrey Kipfmueller, Associate General Counsel, Marquette University
Richard Sweet, Senior Staff Attorney, Wisconsin Legislative Council
